How To SurviveLife-Safety Intelligence for India
Language
Automatic translation
Home / Safety Blogs / An Analysis of Failures Leading to Fire Accidents in Hospitals; with Specific Reference to India
Safety Blog · Ready For Review

An Analysis of Failures Leading to Fire Accidents in Hospitals; with Specific Reference to India

A structured reading of a 2023 peer-reviewed study of reported Indian hospital fires since 2010, with practical controls for electrical systems, oxygen-enriched clinical areas, detection, evacuation, staff training and continuing assurance.

TopicFire Safety · Workplace SafetyUpdated2026-09-18
01
The guide
An Analysis of Failures Leading to Fire Accidents in Hospitals; with Specific Reference to India

Abstract

Fire can be especially dangerous when it occurs in hospitals because many patients in any typical hospital are not physically fit enough to quickly respond to emergency measures, especially evacuation calls. The present paper reports an in-depth assessment of the factors which have led to major fire accidents in Indian hospitals. The study reveals that several building safety codes, acts and guidelines are available, not only to prevent accidental fires but also to minimize harm when such fires do take place. However, observance of the stipulations is very lax, and seems to be exercised more in breach than in compliance. The study reveals that hospitals have zones like the intensive care units which are not only more prone to accidents than other zones but can also cause greater loss of lives due to the presence of critically ill patients, or persons who are extremely vulnerable (for instance newborn babies). Special codes and practices need to be framed for such zones. The study has also identified and catalogued a series of measures which must be implemented in future to prevent accidental fires in hospitals. The study is with reference to accidents that have occurred in India from 2010 to the present but is representative of the situation prevailing in most developing countries.

Introduction

Fire protection in hospital is critically important since it predominantly houses people who are sick, elderly, disabled and need outside assistance for evacuation in case of an emergency [12]. Before 1950, no automatic fire systems had been installed in the Indian hospitals—which was how it was in most of the developing world. It led to several instances when fires caused heavy casualties in hospitals, especially the multi-storied ones [3]. Then, by-and-by, safety systems, codes, and practices were introduced to minimize fire accidents from occurring in hospitals as also mitigate them. Despite this, fire accidents have continued to occur frequently in hospitals across India. Indeed, the worst-ever hospital fire accident in India has happened as recently as in the previous decade. It occurred at one of the AMRI (Advanced Medical Research Institute) group of hospitals in Kolkata in 2011, killing ninety-three persons [4]. It has exposed most poignantly the poor conditions of the Indian hospitals in terms of fire safety. Even though over a decade has elapsed since that disaster, no lessons seem to have been learnt because the frequency with which accidental fires keep breaking out in hospitals has not reduced.

The present study has been carried out to make a quantitative assessment of the causes of hospital accidents in India and the factors which prevented them from being controlled before they had caused serious harm. An attempt has also been made to identify measures with which accidental fires can be prevented in hospitals. The study is with reference to accidents that have occurred in India from 2010 to the present but is representative of the situation prevailing in most developing countries.

A Past Accident Analysis of Hospital Fires in India

To obtain a quantitative assessment of the number and type of fire accidents that have occurred in Indian hospitals, their extents, and the factors that had triggered or accelerated them, data was acquired for the period 2010-present. It was culled from scholarly articles, other reports, newspaper articles, and various sources available in social media and on the internet. Pie charts were then developed to show the relative frequencies of different causes and effects. A chart was also developed on the fraction of hospitals that had lacked legal non-compliance. A comparison was made between fire accidents occurring in private hospitals and government hospitals.

Given that no bias has been allowed in data acquisition vis a vis locations, categories, causes, and effects, the present study is representative even if it may have missed those instances which were not reported in the media.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 provides an assessment of the frequency with which hospital fire accidents have been occurring in India since (and including) 2010. Even as the number of accidents has been per year fluctuating, the statistical trend line indicates a sharply rising frequency.

Nearly as many accidents have occurred in privately funded hospitals as in the government funded ones (Fig. 2).

Short circuit was the major cause of the fire accidents, contributing to 89% of the total outbreaks. Flammable chemicals were the next biggest trigger, causing 4% of the accidents (Fig. 3).

Half of all the hospitals were not compliant of safety requirements (Fig. 4).

A Summary of Representative Accidents

The law requires that all hospitals should obtain certificates of compliance from all regulatory agencies on different aspects of safety and disaster management. But the present study revealed that in practice gadgets for fire prevention and control are often installed simply to get the necessary permission to function. Subsequently there is little or no follow-up to keep the gadgets in fully functional condition, nor keep the staff adequately trained . For instance, in PBM (Prince Bijay Singh Memorial Men’s) Hospital, Bikaner, a short circuit occurred due to faulty electrical wires which were very old and lacked proper insulation . The aged wires could not carry the load which had been increasing with time. A tripping point reached when indiscriminate use of air conditioners, medical equipment, computers, etc., overloaded the wires because there had been no mandatory inspection of the power supply system.

India’s worst-ever hospital fire accident, which occurred at AMRI, Kolkata, in 2011, killing ninety-three people, was escalated by the illegally stored flammable material stored in the hospital’s upper basement floor which was originally made for car parking . The centrally air-conditioned hospital did not have the provision for mechanical ventilation. Consequently, several persons were suffocated to death in the smoke that was formed. Other reasons identified which caused the casualties to increase was the poor emergency preparedness of hospital staff. Due to it one and a half hours elapsed before the fire brigade could start its firefighting measures. The malfunctioning and non-functional smoke detectors and alarms contributed to the slowness of the emergency response.

A fire at the ESIC (Employees’ State Insurance Scheme of India) hospital in Mumbai, witnessed in 2018, exemplifies the consequences of breach of norms caused when hospital premises are used to keep forbidden inventories. An illegal canteen had stored twenty liquid petroleum gas (LPG) cylinders in the hospital’s ground floor . The fire was not only initiated there but escalated quickly due to the illegally stored fuel. Another typical episode of accidental fire involved the intensive care unit (ICU) of Shrey hospital in Ahmedabad, which killed 8 patients . There were no fire extinguishers provided inside the ICU ward and those which were outside the ICU could not be operated by the hospital staff because they were not trained to handle and use the extinguishers.

A reconnaissance by the present authors indicated that the catastrophic fires referred above could have been prevented if there were adequate fire prevention and control facilities in place or if the staff had been trained to enable it to ensure compliance with the codes and standards.

Instances were also found when the license-to-operate of the hospitals had expired, yet the hospitals continued to function, leading to major outbreaks of fire .

The study reveals that many hospitals do not even have the basic fire protection measures in place. When fire started in the Murshidabad Hospital in West Bengal, the emergency exit gate was closed, the fire alarm and the elevator were non-functional, and hospital lacked the basic firefighting infrastructure like fire extinguishers . The fire that raged in the DGH (District General Hospital), Bhandara, in 2021, burnt to death 10 babies because the hospital did not have the mandatory fire extinguishers and the staff was not trained to use whatever equipment that was available . Sunrise Hospital, which is situated on the 3rd floor of Dreams Mall in Bhandup, Maharashtra, was given provisional occupational certificate to run COVID-19 center. March 2021, the hospital witnessed a fire outbreak which took a toll of 11 people . The audit report of the hospital reveals that major firefighting appliances like riser system, pumps, sprinkler system, underground water storage tanks and hydrant system had been installed but none was functional.

After the DGH Bhandara tragedy mentioned above, 484 government hospitals situated in the Indian state of Maharashtra were assessed for fire safety. It was found that in more than 80% institutions, fire safety audit had never been carried out and less than 50% hospitals had conducted mock drills in past. Barring a few, none had obtained fire safety certificates from the concerned agency .

That a general laxity prevails in terms of appreciation of the fire hazard and in taking steps toward risk minimization comes out strongly from these illustrative assessments. One more dimension of the problem has been highlighted by Kodur et al. , which relates particularly to the post-modern buildings in which there is liberal use of plastic-based material in lieu of metal or concrete-based systems used earlier. This presents a major hazard, the risk from which is exacerbated by the generally cavalier attitude of the building managers toward fire safety.

It has also been brought out , that intensive care units (ICUs) of the hospitals pose special risk due to the presence of greater levels of oxygen in their atmosphere. This happens from the inevitable leaks of oxygen occurring from patients put an oxygen support system. It enhances the flammability of the air in the ICU, enhancing the probability of accidental fires.

Summary and Conclusion

An assessment of hospital fires occurring in India has been presented. It is based on accident data spanning 2010-present. Based on frequency analysis it is seen that electrical short circuit is the most common cause of fires in hospitals; accounting for as many as 89% of the fire outbreaks. Flammable material including chemicals catching fire due to causes other than short—circuiting contributed to 4% of the accidents. A slightly larger fraction (54%) of all the fire accidents occurred in Government hospitals while 46% took place in private hospitals. In at least 50% of the hospitals, legal non-compliance was reported. It is seen that timely safety audit can help identify the vulnerabilities in hospitals so they can be addressed in time. Imparting proper training and conducting mock drills at regular intervals can help the staff to remain prepared for emergencies. The paper identifies the challenges faced by hospitals from fire hazards and makes recommendations on how to meet those challenges.

What needs attention

  • Hospitals combine ignition sources with people who may be unable to evacuate independently. A fire plan therefore has to protect patients in place, move them progressively when required and maintain critical clinical support during the response.
  • The underlying paper reviewed media, scholarly and online reports rather than a complete statutory incident registry. Within its collected sample it attributed 89% of reported outbreaks to short circuit, 4% to flammable chemicals, 54% of incidents to government hospitals and 46% to private hospitals, and recorded reported non-compliance in at least half. These figures describe that study sample; they are not national rates.
  • The paper's cases repeatedly show that installed equipment is not enough. Alarms, detection, extinguishers, hydrants, pumps, sprinklers, exits and smoke control need inspection, testing and staff familiarity. A certificate cannot substitute for operational readiness.
  • ICU, NICU, operating and oxygen-use areas require special planning because patients are vulnerable, evacuation is complex and oxygen enrichment can intensify combustion. Electrical loading, temporary equipment and changes in clinical use need continuing review.
  • Effective assurance joins engineering controls with people and records: current drawings, inspection results, fault closure, drills by shift, patient-movement plans and coordination with the responding fire service.

Controls that reduce risk

  1. Verify electrical load, distribution condition, protection settings and maintenance records through a competent assessment.
  2. Test alarms, detectors, emergency lighting, fire doors, smoke control, pumps, hydrants and sprinklers at defined intervals; record and close defects.
  3. Keep exits, stairs, fire-service access and compartment doors usable at all times.
  4. Control oxygen, LPG, chemicals, linen, waste and other fuels through separation and inventory rules.
  5. Create ward-specific evacuation arrangements for patients who need oxygen, mobility assistance or continuous clinical care.
  6. Train every shift in alarm raising, first response, horizontal movement and handover to firefighters.
  7. Run realistic drills without placing patients at risk, and record time, problems and corrective owners.
  8. Reassess fire safety after renovation, equipment additions, occupancy change or temporary clinical expansion.

Common unsafe practices

  • Treating a Fire NOC or audit report as proof that systems remain functional.
  • Adding medical and air-conditioning loads without reassessing ageing wiring and protective devices.
  • Locking exits or obstructing fire-service access.
  • Storing LPG, chemicals, waste or combustible material in unauthorised areas.
  • Assuming clinical staff will know how to move dependent patients without a practiced ward plan.
  • Quoting the paper's convenience sample as a complete national census.
02
Watch & learn

Related Videos

How To Survive

Video research in progress

This temporary branded thumbnail will be replaced automatically when a verified, incident-relevant video is added.

03
Facts & action

Evidence, Cases & Next Steps

Reported short-circuit attribution89%Paper's collected hospital-fire sample; not a national incidence rate
Government hospital share54%Paper sample
Private hospital share46%Paper sample
Reported non-complianceAt least 50%Paper sample
Study sampleShort circuit
Study sampleOther reported triggers
At least halfReported non-compliance

What the evidence supports

  • Evidence base | Peer-reviewed 2023 paper using reported incidents from 2010 onward.
  • Primary vulnerability | Patients may require assisted or progressive evacuation.
  • High-consequence areas | ICU, NICU, operating and oxygen-use zones.
  • Control principle | Tested systems, trained shifts and closed defects—not certificates alone.
  • Statistical boundary | Percentages apply to the authors' collected sample.

Immediate prevention actions

  1. Select one ward and verify its alarm, exit, patient-assistance plan, oxygen-isolation responsibility and most recent closed drill action.

Emergency survival steps

  1. Raise the alarm immediately, follow the hospital's compartment and evacuation plan, move patients only under trained direction, keep fire doors closed and never use lifts unless specifically designed and authorised for the emergency. Tell responders which patients require oxygen or mobility support.

Limitations

  • This is not a current census of all Indian hospital fires and does not establish a causal probability for an individual hospital. Media visibility and available detail can bias the sample. A local hospital requires its own code, engineering and operational assessment.
Community discussion

Questions, experience and constructive safety discussion

Comments publish immediately unless security controls identify spam. Please do not post private information, unsupported allegations or unsafe instructions.

Leave a comment

* Name and email are required. Your email address will not be published.


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.